Mad As A Hatter

I’m nuts, baby, I’m mad,
The craziest friend that you’ve ever had
You think I’m psycho, you think I’m gone
Tell the psychiatrist something is wrong
Over the bend, entirely bonkers
You like me best when I’m off my rocker
Tell you a secret, I’m not alarmed
So what if I’m crazy? The best people are
All the best people are crazy, all the best people are

Where is my prescription?
Doctor, doctor please listen
My brain is scattered
You can be Alice,
I’ll be the mad hatter.

mad_hatter_funny_motivational_quote_post_cards-rd6aa26177e6b483e85736ac54f540baf_vgbaq_8byvr_512

Imagine you’re a kid or a teenager at school and you are at a gym. Some child wants to play ping pong but no one wants to play with him. Since you like ping pong yourself, you agree to play but in the middle of the game it turns out that the child actually doesn’t know how to properly play ping pong and altogether he sucks at it. “Come on” the child finally says “Why do you take yourself so seriously?” You reply “But you wanted to play ping pong.” “But it’s just a game. It aint important. Cheer up. Why be so serious?” Now you start thinking that the child might be a bit mentally challenged.

The Old Geezers, who now pretend to be novices (Good, they have never looked like adepts anyway) farted out another lame blog where they trumpeted out success because some mythical Satanists respond to their polemics. Those mythical Satanists are just Anna Czereda, who isn’t even a Satanist but a Pollock Christian. Since the beginning of the +O+ drama they debated with no Satanist except for the author of this blog and continue to produce piles upon piles of “educational” crap obsessing over Ryan Anschauung (this guy must be really hot) and the above-mentioned cat lady.

So here there comes the first turd: “our anti-o9a critics feeling compelled to respond.” The Mad Pointy Hatters could check the word “dialectic” in their dictionary. In plain words it simply means a debate between two or more people, an exchange of ideas. It’s a dialogue, not a monologue. It’s only natural that when you drop an argument, your opponent in a discussion offers a counter argument. It’s great if everything is within the confines of logic but when you debate a bullshitter and a propagandist, the verbal ping pong often involves sharp retorts and even humorous insults instead of logical arguments. It’s quite laughable when a person who prides himself/herself on being a university scholar can’t write properly a logical syllogism. So what did the Mad Pointed Hatters, who started a smear campaign against Hollow and anyone who questioned their bogus claims, think? That someone will just lie face down on the ring and humbly take the beating, kicking or spitting? They could just take a stroll in the park and kick the rocks.

They keep bragging they have fun at other people’s expense and it doesn’t even enter their heads that they are themselves a source of free entertainment for those who enjoy heated arguments or writing satires. To retort suddenly means to be provoked. To respond suddenly means to be upset or annoyed. I wonder who is here more annoyed. Why are Czereda’s opinions suddenly so important? Why dedicate a blog after a blog to them? And of course calling Ms Scott Liddell out is considered by her and her buddies, who regard her as a troo Mistress, to be an attack on the whole O9A. Now Ms SL could repeat after Luis XIV: “L’etat c’est moi.” The country is me. The ONA is me.

The next turd: “they make mundane and quite laughable assumptions about us.” So say the people who themselves cast judgements on the people whom they have never met. Do unto others as they do unto you. You might be a moron online and a well of wisdom offline. I don’t know you and I don’t care to get to know you better since you yourself don’t care to understand other people’s points of view or motivations. It’s really hilarious when someone publicly humiliates you, ridicules you, calls you names, uses ad hominems in response to your arguments but when you pay them back with the same shit they cry that it’s unfair or that it’s rude, or that you have no manners. Sorry. Are we on the Christian forums? But you are a Christian, they will say. And how do you know? Never trust the words on the internet Anton Long says.

Another brain fart taken out of its original context: “One of the least-known but important signs of a genuine Adept of our Dark Tradition, our sinister way, is the ability to not take one’s self too seriously – to laugh, at one’s self.” I’m not going to laugh at myself, my dear chihuahuas, I’m going to laugh at your goofy asses and mock the shit out of you. Why? Because it’s fun. Dunno if it’s sinister fun but for sure it is fun.

Now it’s time for another turd again taken out of context: “Knowledge is numinous, a part of one’s life, whereas information – that which is presented/communicated by such an ephemeral medium as the world wide web – is lifeless, causal, an outer form…” So says a person who on the Religious Forums wrote that an online debate/dialectic is a “harsh experience”, which can lead to “pathei mathos” and resulting from it “self-honesty.” Oh how idiotic. Ms Scott Liddell and Mr Parker thought that shit-talking Mr RA (this hot Australian dude, you know) will be “harsh experience” that will teach him a lesson in self-honesty. And self honesty according to SL and Mr Parker is nothing else that accepting their crap at face value.

Finally the crazy Pointy Hatters write: “That it has provoked so much reaction so far is testament to the physis of those who have been provoked and have responded on forums and/or on their own blogs.” LOL. No comments. Now you can figure out someone’s physis on the basis of their blogs and forum posts. So much for the “sinister empathy” and “personal knowing.”

I’m pretty sure the Mad Hatters will respond with the standard narrative. Oh Czereda, you’re so mundane, you failed our internet test. But your plebeian rants serve the ONA. You’re spreading ONA memes on your super duper popular blog and on one forum which as many as ten usual Satanic whackos attend. That’s what you call Aeonics. Perhaps, some Mormons could teach the Old Geezers how to spread the Good Word play the Sinister Game.

Agios oh Modemoiselle Baphomet!!!

To be continued…

penny-witch

 

The ONA Troll Carousel

Or in other words: Peasants Disguised as Aristocrats

5616

The Inner ONA clowns again decided to amuse the internet peanut gallery with the staged show. The ONA Old Pricks hired the younger ONA kids (or rather one kid who divides and multiplies into a multitude of sock accounts as usual) to perform what they call Sinister Dialectic. To those who read too many ONA MSS and think that it has something to do with culling, infiltration, causing chaos and then global change, influencing history, Aeonic magic etc, then you all couldn’t be more wrong. Sinister Dialectic, according to all the Pointy Hats, is simply flinging poop on various blogs and forums in a light-hearted and child-like manner with the hope that such poop flinging will produce an alchemical change in the participants. Pathei mathos and all such jazz.

Unfortunately, the Inner ONA bullshitters lack creativity and for more than three years they have been repeating the same tired narrative about the true ONA and fake ONA, pretenders, plebeians and pseudo-Satanists, pretending to insult Myatt or masquerading as Myatt and asking each other questions like the Bridge Keeper in the Monty Python movie. Since no ONA initiates seem to give a rat’s ass about their childish “Sinister Games”, they create fake blogs and sock puppets, talking to themselves, fighting themselves, insulting themselves and questioning themselves in a truly schizophrenic display of narcissistic self-adoration.

Now this is the true picture of the elite… during the Carnival. The beggar became a king, peasants dressed up as aristocrats and are having fun. The Carnival has its privileges. At other times, everything is as it should be. A little fringe group of weirdos fantasizing about evolving humanity.

Now, something about ONA questions:

Distinguishing the Bullshitter

428778_258701784241775_331542345_n

Mademoiselle Baphomet and her cats

How to recognize a bullshitter? It’s not a mystery that the bullshitters have some qualities of character that differentiate them from the non-bullshitters. Their behavior and the techniques of social engineering they use also make them different. And although to the uninitiated, the bullshitter may appear to be a genius, in fact all bullshitters are the same, indulging in similar shenanigans inspired by the cheap and popular “Manipulation for the Dummies” psychology handbooks.

So here are the typical unique machinations of a bullshitter. Since gender equality is trendy sinister, both pronouns, he and she, will be used to ensure the fair treatment of both sexes. After all, the bullshitters come in both male and female forms.

Ad nauseam

If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth, Goebbels said. The bullshitter will repeat her bullshit over and over again, ignoring and dismissing all the arguments to the contrary. She will repeat the bullshit like a mantra or a political slogan:

Women are the victims of the patriarchy.

Women are the victims of the patriarchy.

Women are the victims of the patriarchy.

Women are the victims of the patriarchy.

Women are the victims of the patriarchy.

Women are the victims of the patriarchy…

Till everyone goes zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

Cherry-picking

The bullshitter will choose the facts and arguments that support her bogus theory while ignoring all those that contradict it. She will overgeneralize and twist facts to make her bogus point. All males are bullies. Satanism is just Might is Right. Your paradigm is all about Machiavelli etc.

Argument from intimidation

Fear is one of the basic and primal motivations behind human behavior so the bullshitter will try to scare everyone into accepting his bullshit by saying that everyone who disagrees with him is stupid and that every wise person will accept his claims. He will keep chest beating and blowing his own trumpet and at the same time trying to shame, discourage and put down his opponents. When in a relationship, the bullshitter will use emotional blackmail, threatening to leave if the victim doesn’t give in and have sex with him.

Appeal to vanity

This fairy tale sums it up:

A Fox once saw a Crow fly off with a piece of cheese in its beak and settle on a branch of a tree.

     “That’s for me, as I am a Fox,” said Master Reynard, and he walked up to the foot of the tree.

“Good day, Mistress Crow,” he cried. “How well you are looking today: how glossy your feathers; how bright your eye. I feel sure your voice must surpass that of other birds, just as your figure does; let me hear but one song from you that I may greet you as the Queen of Birds.”

The Crow lifted up her head and began to caw her best, but the moment she opened her mouth the piece of cheese fell to the ground, only to be snapped up by Master Fox.

“That will do,” said he. “That was all I wanted. In exchange for your cheese I will give you a piece of advice for the future: “Do not trust flatterers.”

The Devil is a gentleman

The bullshitter will pretend to be your friend. She will be very civil, kind and will appear reasonable. She will try to convince you to accept her bullshit, all the time trying to stay calm and well-mannered. But once the bullshitter’s bullshit is exposed, the following reactions can be observed:

Self-righteous indignation

How dare you accuse me of dishonesty?!!! The bullshitter will become downright hostile, if not furious. She will get either passive-aggressive or resort to shouting and direct insults.

Gas-lighting

The bullshitter will tell you that you are paranoid since you are not able to trust him.

If the bullshit is hard to be denied, the bullshitter will resort to:

You don’t know me

The bullshitter will try to downplay his machinations by diverting your attention from them, by focusing on more favorable traits of his character, on his past deeds. He will try to make you feel guilty for misunderstanding him and not appreciating the depths of his soul.

Why did you sleep with this woman? How could you?

But darling, do you remember our honeymoon? What about our love? The gifts I gave you? And flowers and hugs and kisses?

But you fucked another wo…

But honey, the bullshitter will interrupt you, it’s just nothing. It’s not important. She’s nothing to me. It was just sex, nothing more. It’s our love that matters. Why worry about such trivial things?

You’re a liar! You’ve always been a liar!

So is that all you see in me? I’m just a liar to you? How disappointing. You’re blind. If you could only see my heart and all the love I have for you, then you wouldn’t judge me by one affair. Perhaps, finally I will find a woman who will appreciate and love me for who I truly am.

And the bullshitter will start crying. Then, he will go away and find another stupid chick to play Don Juan with.

Further studies: